Savitri Devi vs Aruna Rastogi Advocate - Yogesh Kumar — 64/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.
Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: UPCH010036172023
Filing Number
193/2023
Filing Date
30-Nov-2023
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
30-Nov-2023
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Savitri Devi
Adv. Awadhesh Prasad Mishra
-
2.Amit Kumar Tiwari
Adv. Awadhesh Prasad Mishra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aruna Rastogi Advocate - Yogesh Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The High Court of Allahabad allowed the appeal filed by Savitri Devi against the lower court's judgment, finding that the lower court had committed grave legal errors in dismissing her suit regarding a disputed property. The court determined that a fraudulent registered deed dated 12-07-2019 was obtained without plaintiff's knowledge or consent, that no consideration was paid, and that the plaintiff failed to properly evaluate evidence—making the judgment and order susceptible to being set aside. The lower court's decision was quashed and the original suit reinstated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Arguments
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-May-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Oct-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Aug-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-May-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-May-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2023
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 64/2023
Summary The High Court of Allahabad allowed the appeal filed by Savitri Devi against the lower court's judgment, finding that the lower court had committed grave legal errors in dismissing her suit regarding a disputed property. The court determined that a fraudulent registered deed dated 12-07-2019 was obtained without plaintiff's knowledge or consent, that no consideration was paid, and that the plaintiff failed to properly evaluate evidence—making the judgment and order susceptible to being set aside. The lower court's decision was quashed and the original suit reinstated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts