Rajesh vs Sri Ganesh Advocate - Prakash Chandra — 28/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPCH010013172023

Filing Number

79/2023

Filing Date

24-Apr-2023

Registration No

28/2023

Registration Date

24-Apr-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh

    Adv. Brij Kishore Gupta

  2. 2.Dileep Kumar

    Adv. Brij Kishore Gupta

  3. 3.Om Prakash

    Adv. Brij Kishore Gupta

  4. 4.Vijay Kumar

    Adv. Brij Kishore Gupta

  5. 5.Ajay Kumar

    Adv. Brij Kishore Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri Ganesh Advocate - Prakash Chandra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District Judge of Chitrakoot allowed the appeal filed by defendants Rajesh and others, setting aside the trial court's decree that granted plaintiff Sri Ganesh a permanent injunction over disputed land (Plot 141, 0.56 hectares). The court found that Shivpal, from whom Ganesh purchased the property via a 2015 sale deed, had no legal title to transfer since a 2011 Consolidation Officer's order had already cancelled Shivpal's entry and vested ownership in defendant Motilal; applying the principle "nemo dat qui non habet" (one cannot transfer better title than possessed), the sale deed was void, and Ganesh failed to prove ownership or possession of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 31-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 08-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 05-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 22-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 02-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 22-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 14-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 09-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 19-May-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  26. 06-May-2025

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    District and Sessions Judge

  27. 24-Apr-2025

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    District and Sessions Judge

  28. 10-Apr-2025

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    District and Sessions Judge

  29. 24-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  30. 03-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 10-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  32. 18-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 18-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  34. 06-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 21-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  36. 12-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  37. 05-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  38. 16-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  39. 26-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  40. 11-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 28-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  42. 12-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  43. 24-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  44. 08-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  45. 15-May-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  46. 23-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  47. 01-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  48. 05-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  49. 13-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  50. 20-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  51. 19-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  52. 28-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  53. 02-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  54. 10-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  55. 19-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  56. 30-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  57. 09-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  58. 31-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  59. 13-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  60. 03-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  61. 15-May-2023

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  62. 24-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 24-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge of Chitrakoot allowed the appeal filed by defendants Rajesh and others, setting aside the trial court's decree that granted plaintiff Sri Ganesh a permanent injunction over disputed land (Plot 141, 0.56 hectares). The court found that Shivpal, from whom Ganesh purchased the property via a 2015 sale deed, had no legal title to transfer since a 2011 Consolidation Officer's order had already cancelled Shivpal's entry and vested ownership in defendant Motilal; applying the principle "nemo dat qui non habet" (one cannot transfer better title than possessed), the sale deed was void, and Ganesh failed to prove ownership or possession of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case