Kedarnath vs Ramesh Advocate - Purushottam Yadav — 13/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Revision

CNR: UPCH010011212025

Filing Number

53/2025

Filing Date

06-May-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

06-May-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kedarnath

    Adv. Shushil Kumar Tripathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Advocate - Purushottam Yadav

  2. 2.Smt. Shyama Singh

  3. 3.Smt. Seema

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

  3. 06-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District Judge of Chitrakoot accepted revision petitions challenging orders dated 05.04.2025 and 04.07.2025 passed by the Civil Judge. The court found that the lower court erred in accepting late applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and in passing ex-parte decrees without establishing adequate cause, particularly where the defendant was present in the original suit and had filed responses. The court held that both orders violated procedural law and lacked proper reasoning for granting the extensions and ex-parte judgments, consequently setting aside both orders and restoring the case for reconsideration on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 03-Apr-2026

    Objection/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 20-Mar-2026

    Objection/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Objection/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Objection/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Objection/Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 08-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 17-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 30-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 31-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 30-May-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 06-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 06-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge of Chitrakoot accepted revision petitions challenging orders dated 05.04.2025 and 04.07.2025 passed by the Civil Judge. The court found that the lower court erred in accepting late applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and in passing ex-parte decrees without establishing adequate cause, particularly where the defendant was present in the original suit and had filed responses. The court held that both orders violated procedural law and lacked proper reasoning for granting the extensions and ex-parte judgments, consequently setting aside both orders and restoring the case for reconsideration on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case