Jai Prakash Singh vs State of U.P. Advocate - Shyam sunder Mishra — 203/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Not Pressed on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPCH010004842026
Filing Number
457/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
203/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Not Pressed
FIR Details
FIR Number
325
Police Station
MAU
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jai Prakash Singh
Adv. Amit Kumar Mishra
Vipin Yadav
Adv. Amit Kumar Mishra
Respondent(s)
State of U.P. Advocate - Shyam sunder Mishra
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge - I
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the bail application (No. 203/2026) filed by two accused persons charged under IPC sections 303(2), 317(2), 379, 411, and provisions of the Mines Act and Public Property Protection Act. The court dismissed the application because the accused's counsel failed to substantiate the bail plea with sufficient arguments and grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the bail application (No. 203/2026) filed by two accused persons charged under IPC sections 303(2), 317(2), 379, 411, and provisions of the Mines Act and Public Property Protection Act. The court dismissed the application because the accused's counsel failed to substantiate the bail plea with sufficient arguments and grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts