Rohit Sahu vs State of U.P. Advocate - Shyam sunder Mishra — 157/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75(3),115(2),191(2),351(3),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPCH010003782026
Filing Number
357/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
157/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Addl. District and Sessions Judge/ Special Judge POCSO
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
242
Police Station
MAU
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rohit Sahu
Adv. Amit Kumar Mishra
Monu Sahu
Sonu Sahu
Adv. Amit Kumar Mishra
Respondent(s)
State of U.P. Advocate - Shyam sunder Mishra
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Addl. District and Sessions Judge/ Special Judge POCSO
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 19-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Judge (POCSO Act), Chhindwara, granted bail to the three accused (Rohit Sahoo, Monu Sahoo, and Sonu Sahoo) in Case No. 242/2025 under IPC sections 75(3), 115(2), 191(2), 351(3), and 352, finding insufficient evidence of involvement in the alleged incident of harassment and assault of a minor girl and her brother on 01.08.2025. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with conditions to appear before the court as directed and not interfere with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Special Judge (POCSO Act), Chhindwara, granted bail to the three accused (Rohit Sahoo, Monu Sahoo, and Sonu Sahoo) in Case No. 242/2025 under IPC sections 75(3), 115(2), 191(2), 351(3), and 352, finding insufficient evidence of involvement in the alleged incident of harassment and assault of a minor girl and her brother on 01.08.2025. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with conditions to appear before the court as directed and not interfere with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts