State of U.P. vs Munna Shankar Ram — 653/2024
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (prevention) Act, 1986 Section 3(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPCD010041282024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
3768/2024
Filing Date
23-09-2024
Registration No
653/2024
Registration Date
25-09-2024
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Addl. District and Session Judge FTC-II
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
NAUGARH
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of U.P.
Adv. DGC ADJ ftcI
Respondent(s)
Munna Shankar Ram
Raju Singh urf Rajesh Kumar Singh
Pradum Patel urf Ganesh
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Addl. District and Session Judge FTC-II
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The accused, Pradumn Patel, was convicted under Section 3(1) of the Gangster Act and sentenced to three years imprisonment with a fine of ₹5,000, plus an additional 7 days imprisonment in default of fine. The conviction was based on the accused's voluntary plea of guilt, wherein he admitted to forming a criminal gang and committing offenses related to economic and physical harm to gang members under IPC Sections 16, 17, and 22, along with charges under the Uttar Pradesh Goonda Nivarण Act and Arms Act. The court considered his prior detention period and family responsibilities while imposing the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The accused, Pradumn Patel, was convicted under Section 3(1) of the Gangster Act and sentenced to three years imprisonment with a fine of ₹5,000, plus an additional 7 days imprisonment in default of fine. The conviction was based on the accused's voluntary plea of guilt, wherein he admitted to forming a criminal gang and committing offenses related to economic and physical harm to gang members under IPC Sections 16, 17, and 22, along with charges under the Uttar Pradesh Goonda Nivarण Act and Arms Act. The court considered his prior detention period and family responsibilities while imposing the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts