Siyaram Singh vs State of U.P. — 32/2023
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 14th May 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPCD010009182023
Filing Number
849/2023
Filing Date
24-Feb-2023
Registration No
32/2023
Registration Date
27-Feb-2023
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siyaram Singh
Adv. B.N. Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
-
2.Ramdas
-
3.Raghuvar Prasad Gupta
-
4.Lalji Gupta
-
5.Baleshwar Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court admitted the criminal appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 50-day delay in filing, as the appellant Siyaram Singh came to know of the lower court's order only through village acquaintances on 30-01-2023 and subsequently took prompt action to file the appeal. The court found that there was no deliberate negligence and that the appeal was filed within reasonable time after obtaining knowledge of the judgment, thus extending the benefit of the Limitation Act provision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
23-May-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
14-Feb-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
15-Jan-2025
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
09-Oct-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
03-Jul-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
22-May-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
25-Apr-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
29-Mar-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
22-Feb-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
26-Oct-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
18-Oct-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Oct-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
14-Sep-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Jun-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
05-Jun-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
28-Apr-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
29-Mar-2023
Hearing
District & Session Judge
-
02-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 32/2023
The court admitted the criminal appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 50-day delay in filing, as the appellant Siyaram Singh came to know of the lower court's order only through village acquaintances on 30-01-2023 and subsequently took prompt action to file the appeal. The court found that there was no deliberate negligence and that the appeal was filed within reasonable time after obtaining knowledge of the judgment, thus extending the benefit of the Limitation Act provision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts