Madhu Kumari vs State of U.P. — 424/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137/143. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010008982026

Case disposed

Filing Number

861/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

424/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

9-Additional District and Sessions Judge / Special Judge (POCSO Act)

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

GRP Mughalsarai

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137/143
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 77
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 21/22

Petitioner(s)

Madhu Kumari

Adv. OM PRAKASH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Additional District and Sessions Judge / Special Judge (POCSO Act)

17-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Bail Application 424/2026 — Madhu Kumari v. State of U.P. The court rejected Madhu Kumari's bail application in a child trafficking case. She was arrested alongside co-accused on allegations of organized child theft and sale, with two tablets of Alprazolam (narcotic drug) recovered from her possession. The court found the charges—involving stealing children, selling them to others, and drugging victims—to be extremely serious, and determined insufficient grounds for bail based on the FIR details, recovery of contraband, and her alleged involvement in an organized criminal syndicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Application 424/2026 — Madhu Kumari v. State of U.P. The court rejected Madhu Kumari's bail application in a child trafficking case. She was arrested alongside co-accused on allegations of organized child theft and sale, with two tablets of Alprazolam (narcotic drug) recovered from her possession. The court found the charges—involving stealing children, selling them to others, and drugging victims—to be extremely serious, and determined insufficient grounds for bail based on the FIR details, recovery of contraband, and her alleged involvement in an organized criminal syndicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case