Ashish Kumar vs State of U.P. — 404/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,137(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010008452026

Filing Number

810/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

404/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Alinagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,137(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashish Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 404/2026 - Ashish Kumar vs. State of U.P. The court granted bail to accused Ashish Kumar on charges under IPC sections 87 and 137(2) (child abduction and marriage-related offenses). The judge found that the alleged victim, a 16-year-old girl, had voluntarily accompanied the accused based on her own statements under sections 180 and 183 of the Indian Evidence Act, establishing she acted of her own will and fully understood her interests, thereby providing sufficient grounds for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 404/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 404/2026 - Ashish Kumar vs. State of U.P. The court granted bail to accused Ashish Kumar on charges under IPC sections 87 and 137(2) (child abduction and marriage-related offenses). The judge found that the alleged victim, a 16-year-old girl, had voluntarily accompanied the accused based on her own statements under sections 180 and 183 of the Indian Evidence Act, establishing she acted of her own will and fully understood her interests, thereby providing sufficient grounds for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case