Md. Arshad vs State of U.P. — 405/2026
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules Section 3/5a/5b/8. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPCD010008442026
Filing Number
809/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
405/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge SC & ST Act
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
Chandauli
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md. Arshad
Adv. Zubair Ahamad Khan
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Md. Arshad v. State of U.P. (405/2026) Court Decision: The bail application of Md. Arshad was rejected. The Special Judge found sufficient evidence of the accused's involvement in cow smuggling and animal cruelty under the U.P. Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, determining that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offenses and the risk of potential future crimes. Key Reasoning: The court noted that police intercepted three vehicles transporting 34 cattle destined for illegal slaughter in Bihar/West Bengal; the accused's vehicle (bearing registration UP-65-NT-5626) contained 11 cattle in deplorable condition with visible injuries. The court found the prosecution evidence credible and rejected the defense arguments that the FIR was delayed or that the accused lacked involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC & ST Act
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC & ST Act
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 405/2026
Case Summary: Md. Arshad v. State of U.P. (405/2026) Court Decision: The bail application of Md. Arshad was rejected. The Special Judge found sufficient evidence of the accused's involvement in cow smuggling and animal cruelty under the U.P. Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, determining that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offenses and the risk of potential future crimes. Key Reasoning: The court noted that police intercepted three vehicles transporting 34 cattle destined for illegal slaughter in Bihar/West Bengal; the accused's vehicle (bearing registration UP-65-NT-5626) contained 11 cattle in deplorable condition with visible injuries. The court found the prosecution evidence credible and rejected the defense arguments that the FIR was delayed or that the accused lacked involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts