Tofi alias Taufik Kuraishi vs State of U.P. — 136/2026

Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules Section 3/5a/5b/8. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail Application - Anticipatory Bail Application under section 438 CrPC

CNR: UPCD010008432026

Filing Number

808/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

136/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

Illia

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules Section 3/5a/5b/8
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tofi alias Taufik Kuraishi

    Adv. UDAINATH SINGH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Uttar Pradesh court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Tofi alias Taufik Kuraishi in a cattle smuggling case under Sections 3/5A/8 of the Cow Slaughter Prohibition Act and Section 3(5) BNS. The court found that the applicant was named by co-accused persons as being involved in an organized cattle smuggling operation from UP to Bihar, and considered the charges sufficiently grave to deny bail protection at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 136/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Uttar Pradesh court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Tofi alias Taufik Kuraishi in a cattle smuggling case under Sections 3/5A/8 of the Cow Slaughter Prohibition Act and Section 3(5) BNS. The court found that the applicant was named by co-accused persons as being involved in an organized cattle smuggling operation from UP to Bihar, and considered the charges sufficiently grave to deny bail protection at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case