Shahjad Aias Neur vs State of U.P. — 396/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPCD010008202026
Filing Number
786/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
396/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
158
Police Station
GRP Mughalsarai
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahjad Aias Neur
Adv. DILIP KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 396/2026 Shahjad Aias Neur v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Court in Chandauli granted bail to accused Shahjad Aias Neur in an NDPS case (FIR 23/2015) on March 13, 2026. The court found that while a non-bailable warrant had been issued due to the accused's non-appearance on July 30, 2024, subsequent circumstances—including that the accused is a local resident with no flight risk and was previously on bail—made bail appropriate. The court imposed conditions requiring the accused to execute a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to ensure his presence at future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 396/2026 Shahjad Aias Neur v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Court in Chandauli granted bail to accused Shahjad Aias Neur in an NDPS case (FIR 23/2015) on March 13, 2026. The court found that while a non-bailable warrant had been issued due to the accused's non-appearance on July 30, 2024, subsequent circumstances—including that the accused is a local resident with no flight risk and was previously on bail—made bail appropriate. The court imposed conditions requiring the accused to execute a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to ensure his presence at future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts