Shahjad Aias Neur vs State of U.P. — 396/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010008202026

Filing Number

786/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

396/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

GRP Mughalsarai

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shahjad Aias Neur

    Adv. DILIP KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 396/2026 Shahjad Aias Neur v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Court in Chandauli granted bail to accused Shahjad Aias Neur in an NDPS case (FIR 23/2015) on March 13, 2026. The court found that while a non-bailable warrant had been issued due to the accused's non-appearance on July 30, 2024, subsequent circumstances—including that the accused is a local resident with no flight risk and was previously on bail—made bail appropriate. The court imposed conditions requiring the accused to execute a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to ensure his presence at future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 396/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 396/2026 Shahjad Aias Neur v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Court in Chandauli granted bail to accused Shahjad Aias Neur in an NDPS case (FIR 23/2015) on March 13, 2026. The court found that while a non-bailable warrant had been issued due to the accused's non-appearance on July 30, 2024, subsequent circumstances—including that the accused is a local resident with no flight risk and was previously on bail—made bail appropriate. The court imposed conditions requiring the accused to execute a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to ensure his presence at future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case