Shahjad Aias Neur vs State of U.P. — 396/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010008202026

Case disposed

Filing Number

786/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

396/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

GRP Mughalsarai

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20

Petitioner(s)

Shahjad Aias Neur

Adv. DILIP KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

05-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order

Summary of Case 396/2026 Shahjad Aias Neur v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Court in Chandauli granted bail to accused Shahjad Aias Neur in an NDPS case (FIR 23/2015) on March 13, 2026. The court found that while a non-bailable warrant had been issued due to the accused's non-appearance on July 30, 2024, subsequent circumstances—including that the accused is a local resident with no flight risk and was previously on bail—made bail appropriate. The court imposed conditions requiring the accused to execute a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to ensure his presence at future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 396/2026 Shahjad Aias Neur v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Court in Chandauli granted bail to accused Shahjad Aias Neur in an NDPS case (FIR 23/2015) on March 13, 2026. The court found that while a non-bailable warrant had been issued due to the accused's non-appearance on July 30, 2024, subsequent circumstances—including that the accused is a local resident with no flight risk and was previously on bail—made bail appropriate. The court imposed conditions requiring the accused to execute a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to ensure his presence at future hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case