Shahjad Alias Neur vs State of U.P. — 395/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/22. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPCD010008192026
Filing Number
785/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
395/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
GRP Mughalsarai
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahjad Alias Neur
Adv. DILIP KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shahjad Alias Neur v. State of U.P. (Bail Application 395/2026) The court granted bail to the accused Shahjad Alias Neur, charged under Sections 8/22 NDPS Act in FIR 58/2019 (GRP Muglasrai, Chandauli). The court found that despite the accused's non-appearance on 30.07.2024 leading to a non-bailable warrant, he was already on bail in another case and had been in judicial custody since 18.02.2026. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court determined that simple bail was sufficient and ordered his release on personal bond of ₹50,000 with an undertaking to appear on all subsequent dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shahjad Alias Neur v. State of U.P. (Bail Application 395/2026) The court granted bail to the accused Shahjad Alias Neur, charged under Sections 8/22 NDPS Act in FIR 58/2019 (GRP Muglasrai, Chandauli). The court found that despite the accused's non-appearance on 30.07.2024 leading to a non-bailable warrant, he was already on bail in another case and had been in judicial custody since 18.02.2026. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court determined that simple bail was sufficient and ordered his release on personal bond of ₹50,000 with an undertaking to appear on all subsequent dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts