Shashi Kumar vs State of U.P. — 391/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20/60. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010008092026

Filing Number

777/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

391/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

Chandauli

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20/60

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shashi Kumar

    Adv. SHRIKANT GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The District Court of Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh, rejected the bail application of Shashi Kumar Gupta, accused under Sections 8/20/60 of the NDPS Act for allegedly transporting approximately 32.3 kilograms of contraband ganja. The court found sufficient evidence linking the accused to the offense, including his presence in the taxi where the drugs were concealed, and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court of Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh, rejected the bail application of Shashi Kumar Gupta, accused under Sections 8/20/60 of the NDPS Act for allegedly transporting approximately 32.3 kilograms of contraband ganja. The court found sufficient evidence linking the accused to the offense, including his presence in the taxi where the drugs were concealed, and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case