Shivshankar Bhagat vs State of U.P. — 392/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20/60. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010008082026

Case disposed

Filing Number

776/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

392/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

Chandauli

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8/20/60

Petitioner(s)

Shivshankar Bhagat

Adv. SHRIKANT GUPTA

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order

Summary The court rejected Shivshankkar Bhagat's bail application in a case involving alleged illegal cannabis trafficking (32.3 kg seized from a taxi on February 19, 2026). The judge found sufficient grounds to deny bail, noting that the applicant was seated in the vehicle where the contraband was recovered and that the quantity far exceeded commercial limits, making the offense serious under the NDPS Act sections 8/20/60. The bail plea was dismissed based on the strength of the prosecution's case and the gravity of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected Shivshankkar Bhagat's bail application in a case involving alleged illegal cannabis trafficking (32.3 kg seized from a taxi on February 19, 2026). The judge found sufficient grounds to deny bail, noting that the applicant was seated in the vehicle where the contraband was recovered and that the quantity far exceeded commercial limits, making the offense serious under the NDPS Act sections 8/20/60. The bail plea was dismissed based on the strength of the prosecution's case and the gravity of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case