Jitendra Yadav vs State of U.P. — 367/2026

Case under U.p. Excise Act, 1910 Section 60/64. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010007652026

Case disposed

Filing Number

735/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

367/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge SC & ST Act

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

Chakiya

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

U.P. EXCISE ACT, 1910 Section 60/64
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 336(3)

Petitioner(s)

Jitendra Yadav

Adv. Sunil Kumar

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Judge SC & ST Act

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Hearing

25-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Chandauli, U.P. granted bail to Jitendra Yadav (age 24) in an excise and criminal case (Sections 60/64 of the Excise Act and Section 336(3) IPC). While the court acknowledged that liquor bottles, adulteration materials, and equipment were allegedly recovered from his room during a search on February 19, 2026, it found no independent witness corroboration, no criminal history, and determined that bail without conviction was appropriate given the circumstances. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Chandauli, U.P. granted bail to Jitendra Yadav (age 24) in an excise and criminal case (Sections 60/64 of the Excise Act and Section 336(3) IPC). While the court acknowledged that liquor bottles, adulteration materials, and equipment were allegedly recovered from his room during a search on February 19, 2026, it found no independent witness corroboration, no criminal history, and determined that bail without conviction was appropriate given the circumstances. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case