Jitendra Yadav vs State of U.P. — 367/2026

Case under U.p. Excise Act, 1910 Section 60/64. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010007652026

Filing Number

735/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

367/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge SC & ST Act

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

Chakiya

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

U.p. Excise Act, 1910 Section 60/64
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 336(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jitendra Yadav

    Adv. Sunil Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Chandauli, U.P. granted bail to Jitendra Yadav (age 24) in an excise and criminal case (Sections 60/64 of the Excise Act and Section 336(3) IPC). While the court acknowledged that liquor bottles, adulteration materials, and equipment were allegedly recovered from his room during a search on February 19, 2026, it found no independent witness corroboration, no criminal history, and determined that bail without conviction was appropriate given the circumstances. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC & ST Act

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Chandauli, U.P. granted bail to Jitendra Yadav (age 24) in an excise and criminal case (Sections 60/64 of the Excise Act and Section 336(3) IPC). While the court acknowledged that liquor bottles, adulteration materials, and equipment were allegedly recovered from his room during a search on February 19, 2026, it found no independent witness corroboration, no criminal history, and determined that bail without conviction was appropriate given the circumstances. The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case