Ramesh Alias Modhe vs State of U.P. — 32/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPCD010007582026

Case disposed

Filing Number

728/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

SAKALDIHA

Year

2004

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Ramesh Alias Modhe

Adv. Rakesh Ratna Tiwari

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

The Chandigarh District Court accepted the appellant Ramesh Urf Modhe's petition filed with a 10-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, citing his illness as the reason for non-compliance, and condoned the delay while recognizing that the substantive merits of the appeal should be decided after affording both parties full opportunity to present evidence and arguments. The court directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 800 as court fee by March 28, 2026, with the receipt to be submitted to the District Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Chandigarh District Court accepted the appellant Ramesh Urf Modhe's petition filed with a 10-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, citing his illness as the reason for non-compliance, and condoned the delay while recognizing that the substantive merits of the appeal should be decided after affording both parties full opportunity to present evidence and arguments. The court directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 800 as court fee by March 28, 2026, with the receipt to be submitted to the District Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case