Sachin Yadav vs State of U.P. — 122/2026

Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules Section 3/5a/5b/8. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 11th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail Application - Anticipatory Bail Application under section 438 CrPC

CNR: UPCD010007552026

Case disposed

Filing Number

725/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

122/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

SYEDRAJA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules Section 3/5a/5b/8
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Sachin Yadav

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sachin Yadav, who was charged under the U.P. Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and IPC sections for allegedly transporting cattle for slaughter. The court found that Yadav, as an accomplice, incited other vehicles to evade police, resulting in rash and dangerous driving that endangered police officers' lives, making the offence serious in nature. The court concluded that anticipatory bail was not warranted given the gravity of the criminal conduct and organized nature of the cattle smuggling operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sachin Yadav, who was charged under the U.P. Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and IPC sections for allegedly transporting cattle for slaughter. The court found that Yadav, as an accomplice, incited other vehicles to evade police, resulting in rash and dangerous driving that endangered police officers' lives, making the offence serious in nature. The court concluded that anticipatory bail was not warranted given the gravity of the criminal conduct and organized nature of the cattle smuggling operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case