Sachin Yadav vs State of U.P. — 122/2026

Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules Section 3/5a/5b/8. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail Application - Anticipatory Bail Application under section 438 CrPC

CNR: UPCD010007552026

Filing Number

725/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

122/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

SYEDRAJA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules Section 3/5a/5b/8

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

1.Sachin Yadav

Respondent(s)

1.State of U.P.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sachin Yadav, who was charged under the U.P. Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and IPC sections for allegedly transporting cattle for slaughter. The court found that Yadav, as an accomplice, incited other vehicles to evade police, resulting in rash and dangerous driving that endangered police officers' lives, making the offence serious in nature. The court concluded that anticipatory bail was not warranted given the gravity of the criminal conduct and organized nature of the cattle smuggling operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1
06-Mar-2026

Hearing

Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1
24-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 122/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sachin Yadav, who was charged under the U.P. Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and IPC sections for allegedly transporting cattle for slaughter. The court found that Yadav, as an accomplice, incited other vehicles to evade police, resulting in rash and dangerous driving that endangered police officers' lives, making the offence serious in nature. The court concluded that anticipatory bail was not warranted given the gravity of the criminal conduct and organized nature of the cattle smuggling operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.