Vishal Gupta vs State of U.P. — 332/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(a),331(4),317(2),317(4). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPCD010006912026

Filing Number

662/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

332/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

MOGHAL SARAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(a),331(4),317(2),317(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishal Gupta

    Adv. AMARNATH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Vishal Gupta, accused of theft under IPC Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2), and 317(4). The court found that while the FIR was filed with delay and lacked independent witnesses, the evidence was insufficient to deny bail at this stage, and the applicant had been in custody since January 20, 2026. Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 332/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Vishal Gupta, accused of theft under IPC Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2), and 317(4). The court found that while the FIR was filed with delay and lacked independent witnesses, the evidence was insufficient to deny bail at this stage, and the applicant had been in custody since January 20, 2026. Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case