Ramashankar Sahani vs State of U.P. — 90/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,186,323,332,341,342,353,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 12th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail Application - Anticipatory Bail Application under section 438 CrPC

CNR: UPCD010005302026

Case disposed

Filing Number

509/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

Chakiya

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 143,147,148,149,186,323,332,341,342,353,504,506,34
Criminal Law Amendment Act Section 7
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

Ramashankar Sahani

Adv. SHAFIQ KHAN

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District & Session Judge RNo. 1

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Ramashankar Sahani and 11 others (Case No. 509/2026). The court found that the applicants, along with 50-60 unknown persons, allegedly assaulted police personnel, blocked a public highway for approximately four hours, and obstructed a government operation by forcibly detaining a tractor driver and making extortion demands. The court determined that the applicants failed to disclose previous rejected bail applications and submitted false affidavits, concluding they were not entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC due to the serious nature of the offenses and their direct involvement in the criminal acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Ramashankar Sahani and 11 others (Case No. 509/2026). The court found that the applicants, along with 50-60 unknown persons, allegedly assaulted police personnel, blocked a public highway for approximately four hours, and obstructed a government operation by forcibly detaining a tractor driver and making extortion demands. The court determined that the applicants failed to disclose previous rejected bail applications and submitted false affidavits, concluding they were not entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC due to the serious nature of the offenses and their direct involvement in the criminal acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case