Maneesh Shrivastava vs State of U.P. — 768/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBR010030422026

Filing Number

2929/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

768/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-V th ADJ

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

216

Police Station

FATEHGANJ WEST

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maneesh Shrivastava

    Adv. Kishan Lal Pahuja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of accused Manish Srivastava in a human trafficking case (IPC Sections 143(2), 3(5)) filed at Fatehganj Police Station, Bareilly. The court found that the accused, in conspiracy with a woman named Gita, forcibly married the victim (an 18-year-old girl) to a man named Bablu after extorting money, and the victim was subsequently confined and exploited, establishing serious charges of human trafficking that warrant continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    V th ADJ

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    V th ADJ

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 768/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of accused Manish Srivastava in a human trafficking case (IPC Sections 143(2), 3(5)) filed at Fatehganj Police Station, Bareilly. The court found that the accused, in conspiracy with a woman named Gita, forcibly married the victim (an 18-year-old girl) to a man named Bablu after extorting money, and the victim was subsequently confined and exploited, establishing serious charges of human trafficking that warrant continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case