State Government vs BADAM SINGH — 3867/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,323,324,504,506. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
Warrant or Summons Criminal Case
CNR: UPBN240056142024
Filing Number
5524/2024
Filing Date
04-12-2024
Registration No
3867/2024
Registration Date
04-12-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Sahaswan
Judge
2-Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
167
Police Station
ZARIF NAGAR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
BADAM SINGH
MOHARPAL
KARRU
SANJU
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) of Badaun acquitted all four accused persons—Badam Singh, Moharpal, Karru, and Sanju—charged under IPC sections 323, 324, 452, 504, and 506 for alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witness (complainant) contradicted his initial statement during cross-examination, and other witnesses did not support the prosecution's narrative, rendering them hostile witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) of Badaun acquitted all four accused persons—Badam Singh, Moharpal, Karru, and Sanju—charged under IPC sections 323, 324, 452, 504, and 506 for alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witness (complainant) contradicted his initial statement during cross-examination, and other witnesses did not support the prosecution's narrative, rendering them hostile witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts