State Government vs MATRU Advocate - NARENDRA KUMAR — 157/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),118(1),352,351(2),117(2). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBN240008682026

Filing Number

796/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

157/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Sahaswan

Judge

2-Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3933

Police Station

ZARIF NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),118(1),352,351(2),117(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MATRU Advocate - NARENDRA KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Judicial Magistrate, Sahaswan, Badaun granted bail to the accused Mataur (son of Mahendra) in criminal case no. 3933/2025 charged under IPC sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), and 117(2). The court found sufficient prima facie grounds for bail after noting that the chargesheet had been filed and the accused was ready to furnish bail bond. The accused was released on bail upon depositing a personal bond of ₹25,000 and an equal surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Judicial Magistrate, Sahaswan, Badaun granted bail to the accused Mataur (son of Mahendra) in criminal case no. 3933/2025 charged under IPC sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), and 117(2). The court found sufficient prima facie grounds for bail after noting that the chargesheet had been filed and the accused was ready to furnish bail bond. The accused was released on bail upon depositing a personal bond of ₹25,000 and an equal surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case