VIRLESH vs PUSHPA — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPBN240007192026

Filing Number

662/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Sahaswan

Judge

2-Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECIDED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

NIL

Police Station

ZARIF NAGAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIRLESH

    Adv. SAYED JAVED IQBAL NAQVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPA

  2. 2.VIRLESH

  3. 3.RAMBHUP

  4. 4.CHANDRAKESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNSS by registering it as a complaint rather than directing police investigation. The court found that the petitioner had sufficient knowledge of facts and could present witnesses in court, making police investigation unnecessary, and applied the principle that when adequate reasons exist, such petitions need not be referred for investigation but can be treated as complaints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Report

    Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. Civil Judge Jr. Div.,Sahaswan

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNSS by registering it as a complaint rather than directing police investigation. The court found that the petitioner had sufficient knowledge of facts and could present witnesses in court, making police investigation unnecessary, and applied the principle that when adequate reasons exist, such petitions need not be referred for investigation but can be treated as complaints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case