SHREE SHARMA vs TEJPAL — 26/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED on 16th April 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPBN120002992026
Filing Number
216/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Bisauli
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Div. Bisauli, Budaun
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
NIL
Police Station
BISAULI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHREE SHARMA
Adv. ADVOCATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.TEJPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The Civil Judge Jr. Division of Bisauli, Budaun dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNS, finding that the dispute between the parties concerns property ownership and partition of ancestral land—essentially a civil matter already pending as Civil Suit No. 528/2025. The court held that converting a civil dispute into a criminal case undermines the distinction between civil and criminal proceedings, citing Supreme Court precedent that avoidable civil disputes should be resolved in civil courts, not criminal courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr. Div. Bisauli, Budaun
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr. Div. Bisauli, Budaun
-
23-Mar-2026
Report
Civil Judge Jr. Div. Bisauli, Budaun
-
11-Mar-2026
Report
Civil Judge Jr. Div. Bisauli, Budaun
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2026
The Civil Judge Jr. Division of Bisauli, Budaun dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNS, finding that the dispute between the parties concerns property ownership and partition of ancestral land—essentially a civil matter already pending as Civil Suit No. 528/2025. The court held that converting a civil dispute into a criminal case undermines the distinction between civil and criminal proceedings, citing Supreme Court precedent that avoidable civil disputes should be resolved in civil courts, not criminal courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts