GEETA URF REETA vs State of UP — 333/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision - Criminal Revision Cases

CNR: UPBN010082012024

Filing Number

8196/2024

Filing Date

01-Oct-2024

Registration No

333/2024

Registration Date

04-Dec-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEETA URF REETA

    Adv. SURESH CHANDRA SAXENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

  2. 2.VIRANDRA SINGH

  3. 3.PAPPU SINGH

  4. 4.SATOSH

  5. 5.CHHUTTO

  6. 6.GIRISH SINGH

  7. 7.ANITA

  8. 8.SARVESH SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The High Court accepted a criminal revision petition and set aside the lower court's order dated 19.07.2024 in a dowry harassment case (IPC §498A). The court found that the Magistrate prematurely closed the complainant's evidence after she submitted a postponement application, without allowing the defense adequate opportunity for cross-examination despite multiple adjournments. The court directed the lower court to re-issue necessary orders and permit the complainant to present her complete evidence as per procedural requirements under the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Order/Disposal

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  11. 22-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  17. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  18. 09-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  19. 22-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  20. 07-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  21. 22-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  22. 05-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  23. 11-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  24. 19-May-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  25. 06-May-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  26. 22-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  27. 18-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  28. 01-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    A.d.and S.j., Court No.-1, Budaun

  29. 13-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  30. 22-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  31. 23-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  32. 04-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 01-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 333/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court accepted a criminal revision petition and set aside the lower court's order dated 19.07.2024 in a dowry harassment case (IPC §498A). The court found that the Magistrate prematurely closed the complainant's evidence after she submitted a postponement application, without allowing the defense adequate opportunity for cross-examination despite multiple adjournments. The court directed the lower court to re-issue necessary orders and permit the complainant to present her complete evidence as per procedural requirements under the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case