RAVI vs State of UP — 612/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),351(2),352,109. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBN010020092026

Filing Number

1949/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

612/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge, Budaun

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

107

Police Station

UJHANI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),351(2),352,109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI

    Adv. ALAM KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Badaun, granted bail to accused Ravi in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 117(2), 351(2), 352, and 109, arising from a group altercation where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant and his associates with weapons, causing grievous injuries. The court found the medical evidence showed serious but not life-threatening injuries, noted the co-accused had already been granted bail, and observed the accused had no criminal history, warranting bail on a personal bond of one lakh rupees with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge, Budaun

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 612/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Badaun, granted bail to accused Ravi in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 117(2), 351(2), 352, and 109, arising from a group altercation where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant and his associates with weapons, causing grievous injuries. The court found the medical evidence showed serious but not life-threatening injuries, noted the co-accused had already been granted bail, and observed the accused had no criminal history, warranting bail on a personal bond of one lakh rupees with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case