SANTOSH YADAV vs State of UP — 611/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),3/5. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 16th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPBN010020072026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1947/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

611/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-A.D.AND S.J./SPL. JUDGE D.A.A, BUDAUN

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

612

Police Station

CIVIL LINES

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),3/5
Arms Act Section 3/25(1-b)(a)/27

Petitioner(s)

SANTOSH YADAV

Adv. RAJENDRA PAL

Respondent(s)

State of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 4-A.D.AND S.J./SPL. JUDGE D.A.A, BUDAUN

16-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Order

The court approved the bail petition of Santosh Yadav, who was accused of attempted murder and illegal weapon possession following a police encounter in Badaun, Uttar Pradesh. The judge granted bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties, noting evidentiary gaps including lack of independent witnesses to the encounter and absence of video documentation, while imposing conditions that he cooperate in investigation and appear regularly before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the bail petition of Santosh Yadav, who was accused of attempted murder and illegal weapon possession following a police encounter in Badaun, Uttar Pradesh. The judge granted bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties, noting evidentiary gaps including lack of independent witnesses to the encounter and absence of video documentation, while imposing conditions that he cooperate in investigation and appear regularly before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case