ASHRAF vs State of UP — 526/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506,504,352. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBN010016702026

Filing Number

1613/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

526/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-A.D. And S.J./Spl. Judge SC/St(pa) Act,budaun

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

BINAWAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 506,504,352
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)Gha,3(1)Da

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHRAF

    Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) of Badaun granted bail to Mohammad Ashraf Ali in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)(e). The court found that the FIR was delayed, caste-based slur allegations were absent from both the FIR and victim statements, and the accused had not misused interim bail previously. Applying the Supreme Court's *Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI* principle and considering case facts, the court deemed bail release justified and ordered his release on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with personal bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D. And S.J./Spl. Judge SC/St(pa) Act,budaun

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D. And S.J./Spl. Judge SC/St(pa) Act,budaun

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 526/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) of Badaun granted bail to Mohammad Ashraf Ali in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)(e). The court found that the FIR was delayed, caste-based slur allegations were absent from both the FIR and victim statements, and the accused had not misused interim bail previously. Applying the Supreme Court's *Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI* principle and considering case facts, the court deemed bail release justified and ordered his release on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with personal bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case