ASHRAF vs State of UP — 526/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506,504,352. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBN010016702026
Filing Number
1613/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
526/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-A.D. AND S.J./SPL. JUDGE SC/ST(PA) ACT,BUDAUN
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
BINAWAR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHRAF
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA
Respondent(s)
State of UP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-A.D. AND S.J./SPL. JUDGE SC/ST(PA) ACT,BUDAUN
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) of Badaun granted bail to Mohammad Ashraf Ali in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)(e). The court found that the FIR was delayed, caste-based slur allegations were absent from both the FIR and victim statements, and the accused had not misused interim bail previously. Applying the Supreme Court's *Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI* principle and considering case facts, the court deemed bail release justified and ordered his release on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with personal bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) of Badaun granted bail to Mohammad Ashraf Ali in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)(e). The court found that the FIR was delayed, caste-based slur allegations were absent from both the FIR and victim statements, and the accused had not misused interim bail previously. Applying the Supreme Court's *Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI* principle and considering case facts, the court deemed bail release justified and ordered his release on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with personal bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts