TAJEEB vs State of UP — 513/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBN010016612026
Filing Number
1605/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
513/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-A.d.and S.J./Spl. Judge E.C. Act, Budaun
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
BINAWAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TAJEEB
Adv. AKSHAY PRATAP SINGH
-
2.MOHAMMAD KAIF
-
3.AAMIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of UP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court at Badaun granted bail to three accused persons (Taajib, Mohammad Kaif, and Aamir) who were arrested for allegedly stealing batteries under Section 317(2) BNS. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the prosecution's opposition, noting that the recovery lacked independent witness corroboration and the offense carries a maximum seven-year sentence. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation in trial, non-intimidation of witnesses, and non-involvement in criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
A.d.and S.J./Spl. Judge E.C. Act, Budaun
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
A.d.and S.J./Spl. Judge E.C. Act, Budaun
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
A.d.and S.J./Spl. Judge E.C. Act, Budaun
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
A.d.and S.J./Spl. Judge E.C. Act, Budaun
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 513/2026
Court Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court at Badaun granted bail to three accused persons (Taajib, Mohammad Kaif, and Aamir) who were arrested for allegedly stealing batteries under Section 317(2) BNS. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the prosecution's opposition, noting that the recovery lacked independent witness corroboration and the offense carries a maximum seven-year sentence. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation in trial, non-intimidation of witnesses, and non-involvement in criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts