JAY PRAKASH vs ROSHAN — 7/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases - Misc Civil Cases

CNR: UPBN010004082026

Filing Number

12/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

7/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge, Budaun

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAY PRAKASH

    Adv. NEKPAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROSHAN

  2. 2.REMESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court approved the transfer petition (T.A. No. 07/2026) and directed that Civil Suit No. 60/2007 (Jai Prakash v. Roshan Lal) be transferred from the District Court of Baharaich to the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Sahaswan. The court found that while the petitioner's grievances about the lower court's conduct lacked corroborating evidence, the principle that justice must not only be done but also appear to be done warranted the transfer to ensure fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge, Budaun

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge, Budaun

  11. 14-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the transfer petition (T.A. No. 07/2026) and directed that Civil Suit No. 60/2007 (Jai Prakash v. Roshan Lal) be transferred from the District Court of Baharaich to the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Sahaswan. The court found that while the petitioner's grievances about the lower court's conduct lacked corroborating evidence, the principle that justice must not only be done but also appear to be done warranted the transfer to ensure fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case