State Government vs tikam — 279/2019
Case under Excise (Malt Liquors) Act Section 60(1). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 09th March 2026 Date Not Updated.
CRI. CASE
CNR: UPBJ180007252019
Filing Number
279/2019
Filing Date
18-May-2019
Registration No
279/2019
Registration Date
18-May-2019
Court
Civil Judge Junior DIvision, Nagina
Judge
3-Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
BARHAPUR
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
-
1.tikam
Case History
-
09-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Dec-2025
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
13-Oct-2025
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
19-Aug-2025
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
26-Jun-2025
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
29-Apr-2025
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
07-Mar-2025
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
09-Jan-2025
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
12-Nov-2024
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
11-Sep-2024
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
10-Jul-2024
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
28-May-2024
Copy of document.View PDF
Case Summary This is a criminal case (FIR No. 279/2019) under Section 60(1) of the Excise Act at Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Nagina, Bijnor. The accused Tikam was arrested on 23.03.2019 for allegedly possessing 20 liters of illicit liquor at Kujeta village in Badapur police station area. The court recorded the accused's statement on 28.05.2024 under Section 251 CrPC, where the magistrate posed questions regarding the allegations and the accused's response, and the statement was duly noted and signed by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2024
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
24-Apr-2024
Appearance
Addl Civil Judge (J.d.) Court No-2
-
02-Apr-2024
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
01-Mar-2024
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
31-Jan-2024
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
05-Jan-2024
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
05-Dec-2023
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
13-Sep-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Jun-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
05-May-2023
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
23-Mar-2023
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
06-Jan-2023
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
02-Nov-2022
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
30-Aug-2022
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
23-Jun-2022
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
22-Apr-2022
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
14-Feb-2022
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
08-Dec-2021
Appearance
Addl. Civil Judge(J.D.) Court No-1
-
08-Oct-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
20-Aug-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
07-Jun-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
14-Dec-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
24-Sep-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-Jun-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
02-Jun-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Mar-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
29-Jan-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
03-Jan-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
29-Nov-2019
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
11-Nov-2019
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 279/2019
Case Summary This is a criminal case (FIR No. 279/2019) under Section 60(1) of the Excise Act at Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Nagina, Bijnor. The accused Tikam was arrested on 23.03.2019 for allegedly possessing 20 liters of illicit liquor at Kujeta village in Badapur police station area. The court recorded the accused's statement on 28.05.2024 under Section 251 CrPC, where the magistrate posed questions regarding the allegations and the accused's response, and the statement was duly noted and signed by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts