Yogita Rathi vs Sanyogita Vishnoi and others — 1984/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,504. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 09th March 2026 Date Not Updated.

Appearance Next hearing 09-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Warrant or Summons Criminal Case

CNR: UPBJ160025002022

Filing Number

2111/2022

Filing Date

19-Jul-2022

Registration No

1984/2022

Registration Date

23-Jul-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina

Judge

1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

NAGINA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yogita Rathi

    Adv. Ch. Sanjeev Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanyogita Vishnoi and others

Case History

  1. 09-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 25-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 27-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 30-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 27-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 28-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 27-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 28-May-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 12-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 07-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 29-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 28-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 16-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 29-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 02-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 01-Jul-2024

    Restored

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 01-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 05-Jul-2023

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The petition (Case No. 1984/22) filed before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, Bijnor has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner sought to revive proceedings from an earlier case (No. 439/11) that had been closed due to non-prosecution and default, which was deemed improper and not legally justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 05-Jul-2023

    Disposed

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 26-Jun-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 15-Jun-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 15-May-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 20-Apr-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 29-Mar-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 02-Mar-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 22-Feb-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 02-Feb-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 30-Jan-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 05-Jan-2023

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 20-Dec-2022

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 30-Nov-2022

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 19-Sep-2022

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 24-Aug-2022

    Statement 200

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 29-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 19-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1984/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition (Case No. 1984/22) filed before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, Bijnor has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner sought to revive proceedings from an earlier case (No. 439/11) that had been closed due to non-prosecution and default, which was deemed improper and not legally justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case