State Government vs shamim — 1012/2018

Case under Electricity Act Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Electricity Act

CNR: UPBJ010087682018

Filing Number

1012/2018

Filing Date

07-Sep-2018

Registration No

1012/2018

Registration Date

07-Sep-2018

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

    Adv. d

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.shamim

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgment copyView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court found accused Shamim guilty under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act for illegally reconnecting his domestic electricity connection (which had been temporarily disconnected for non-payment of dues on November 25, 2017) and using electricity without authorization. The court convicted him based on the inspection report, FIR, and witness testimony establishing the offense beyond reasonable doubt, combined with the accused's own admission of guilt. Shamim was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹1,000 with an additional one-month simple imprisonment in default of payment, considering his poor economic condition and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  13. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  15. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  16. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  18. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  19. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  20. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  21. 29-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  22. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  23. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  24. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  25. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  26. 15-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  27. 15-May-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  28. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  29. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  30. 01-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  31. 25-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  32. 10-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  33. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  34. 18-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  35. 06-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  36. 11-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  37. 30-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  38. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  39. 25-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  40. 21-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  41. 26-May-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  42. 18-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  43. 15-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  44. 11-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  45. 02-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  46. 03-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  47. 12-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  48. 08-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  49. 04-May-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  50. 23-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  51. 16-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  52. 05-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  53. 14-Jan-2021

    Charge

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  54. 11-Dec-2020

    Charge

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  55. 16-Nov-2020

    Charge

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  56. 13-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  57. 16-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  58. 25-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  59. 01-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  60. 27-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  61. 26-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  62. 06-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  63. 16-May-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  64. 27-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  65. 04-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  66. 07-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  67. 13-Feb-2020

    Charge

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  68. 29-Jan-2020

    Charge

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  69. 20-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  70. 02-Jan-2020

    Charge

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  71. 16-Dec-2019

    Charge

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  72. 24-Oct-2019

    Appeareance

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  73. 13-Sep-2019

    hearing

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  74. 21-May-2019

    hearing

    Spl. Judge (E.C.Act)

  75. 22-Feb-2019

    hearing

    IV-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  76. 23-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  77. 07-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1012/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court found accused Shamim guilty under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act for illegally reconnecting his domestic electricity connection (which had been temporarily disconnected for non-payment of dues on November 25, 2017) and using electricity without authorization. The court convicted him based on the inspection report, FIR, and witness testimony establishing the offense beyond reasonable doubt, combined with the accused's own admission of guilt. Shamim was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹1,000 with an additional one-month simple imprisonment in default of payment, considering his poor economic condition and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case