Anupam Vijay Gupta @ Anupam Vijay vs Nuremuzammil And One Others — 14/2020
Case under Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Section .... Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: UPBJ010059922020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
461/2020
Filing Date
22-12-2020
Registration No
14/2020
Registration Date
22-12-2020
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-III-Addl. District Judge/Regular
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anupam Vijay Gupta @ Anupam Vijay
Adv. Prashant Kumar Goel.
Respondent(s)
Nuremuzammil And One Others
Hearing History
Judge: 4-III-Addl. District Judge/Regular
Disposed
Judgements
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgements | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff (landlord Anupam Vijay Gupta) against the defendants, ordering them to vacate shop no. 22 (now bearing number 64/16) in Ramesh Super Bazar, Bijaur, and deliver its actual possession to the plaintiff within three months. The court found that the defendants unlawfully withheld rent after March 2018, obstructed a private passage through unauthorized construction, and failed to pay accumulated rent and damages totaling ₹5,03,201.17 despite a legal notice issued under Section 106 of the Tenancy Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff (landlord Anupam Vijay Gupta) against the defendants, ordering them to vacate shop no. 22 (now bearing number 64/16) in Ramesh Super Bazar, Bijaur, and deliver its actual possession to the plaintiff within three months. The court found that the defendants unlawfully withheld rent after March 2018, obstructed a private passage through unauthorized construction, and failed to pay accumulated rent and damages totaling ₹5,03,201.17 despite a legal notice issued under Section 106 of the Tenancy Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts