Anupam Vijay Gupta Urf Anupam Vijay vs Mohd. Nasir Urf Nasir Ahmad — 9/2020
Case under Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Section ... Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: UPBJ010051422020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
369/2020
Filing Date
04-11-2020
Registration No
9/2020
Registration Date
04-11-2020
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-III-Addl. District Judge/Regular
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anupam Vijay Gupta Urf Anupam Vijay
Adv. Parshant Kumar Goel
Respondent(s)
Mohd. Nasir Urf Nasir Ahmad
Hearing History
Judge: 4-III-Addl. District Judge/Regular
Disposed
Judgements
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgements | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff (landlord) against the defendant (tenant), ordering the defendant to vacate shop no. 17 in Ramesh Super Bazaar and pay outstanding rent of ₹82,672.10 along with damages, compensation for unauthorized obstruction of common passage (₹1,000/month), and use and occupation charges (₹8,000/month) from the notice date. The court found the defendant in willful default of rent payment obligations despite the rental agreement requiring 10% biennial increases, and upheld the validity of the eviction notice issued under the Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1972. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff (landlord) against the defendant (tenant), ordering the defendant to vacate shop no. 17 in Ramesh Super Bazaar and pay outstanding rent of ₹82,672.10 along with damages, compensation for unauthorized obstruction of common passage (₹1,000/month), and use and occupation charges (₹8,000/month) from the notice date. The court found the defendant in willful default of rent payment obligations despite the rental agreement requiring 10% biennial increases, and upheld the validity of the eviction notice issued under the Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1972. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts