State Government vs RESHU URF PRIYANSHU — 808/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBJ010029872026
Filing Number
2810/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
808/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
NAJIBABAD
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
RESHU URF PRIYANSHU
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act
Disposed
hearing
hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyansh) in bail applications 755/2026 and 808/2026, involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)d, 3(1)g, 3(2)5. The court found that while the FIR alleged a serious assault with firearms and weapons causing injuries, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and were added during investigation; medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the severity alleged. Bail was approved on conditions including personal bonds of ₹50,000 each, cooperation with investigation, no intimidation of witnesses, and court appearance as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyansh) in bail applications 755/2026 and 808/2026, involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)d, 3(1)g, 3(2)5. The court found that while the FIR alleged a serious assault with firearms and weapons causing injuries, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and were added during investigation; medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the severity alleged. Bail was approved on conditions including personal bonds of ₹50,000 each, cooperation with investigation, no intimidation of witnesses, and court appearance as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts