State Government vs RESHU URF PRIYANSHU — 808/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010029872026

Filing Number

2810/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

808/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

NAJIBABAD

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1)

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(2) 5 3(1) R S

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government

Respondent(s)

1.RESHU URF PRIYANSHU

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order CopyView PDF

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyansh) in bail applications 755/2026 and 808/2026, involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)d, 3(1)g, 3(2)5. The court found that while the FIR alleged a serious assault with firearms and weapons causing injuries, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and were added during investigation; medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the severity alleged. Bail was approved on conditions including personal bonds of ₹50,000 each, cooperation with investigation, no intimidation of witnesses, and court appearance as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act
09-Mar-2026

hearing

Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act
27-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 808/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyansh) in bail applications 755/2026 and 808/2026, involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)d, 3(1)g, 3(2)5. The court found that while the FIR alleged a serious assault with firearms and weapons causing injuries, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and were added during investigation; medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the severity alleged. Bail was approved on conditions including personal bonds of ₹50,000 each, cooperation with investigation, no intimidation of witnesses, and court appearance as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.