State Government vs yunus, messer — 738/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010029262026

Filing Number

2753/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

738/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

Mahila Police Paramarsh Kendra Chandpur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.yunus, messer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order CopyView PDF

    The court granted bail to the accused Yunus and Messer Jahan in a dowry harassment case (IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4), finding the FIR delayed with no independent witnesses and no prior criminal history of the accused. Each accused was released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on conditions including appearing in court as required and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 738/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused Yunus and Messer Jahan in a dowry harassment case (IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4), finding the FIR delayed with no independent witnesses and no prior criminal history of the accused. Each accused was released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on conditions including appearing in court as required and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case