State Government vs Shamshad — 774/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238A,61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010029152026

Filing Number

2744/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

774/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

426

Police Station

SEOHARA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238A,61(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shamshad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order CopyView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bijnor rejected the bail application of accused Shamshad in a murder case (Crime No. 426/2025). Shamshad was accused along with co-accused Nafis, Mahavir, and others of conspiring to murder and killing Nafis's son Salman, whose body was found with injuries indicating death by asphyxiation. The court found sufficient evidence including witness statements, post-mortem report, and circumstantial evidence supporting the serious nature of the crime, thereby denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 774/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bijnor rejected the bail application of accused Shamshad in a murder case (Crime No. 426/2025). Shamshad was accused along with co-accused Nafis, Mahavir, and others of conspiring to murder and killing Nafis's son Salman, whose body was found with injuries indicating death by asphyxiation. The court found sufficient evidence including witness statements, post-mortem report, and circumstantial evidence supporting the serious nature of the crime, thereby denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case