State Government vs PRINCE — 755/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBJ010028822026
Filing Number
2715/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
755/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
NAJIBABAD
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
PRINCE
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act
Disposed
hearing
hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyanshu) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(g), 3(2)(5). The court found that while the FIR alleges a serious incident of assault with a firearm and injuries to the complainant, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and the medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the allegations. The court granted bail on Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyanshu) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(g), 3(2)(5). The court found that while the FIR alleges a serious incident of assault with a firearm and injuries to the complainant, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and the medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the allegations. The court granted bail on Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts