State Government vs PRINCE — 755/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010028822026

Filing Number

2715/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

755/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

NAJIBABAD

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(1) R S 3(2) 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRINCE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order CopyView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyanshu) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(g), 3(2)(5). The court found that while the FIR alleges a serious incident of assault with a firearm and injuries to the complainant, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and the medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the allegations. The court granted bail on Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 755/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Prince and Reshu (Priyanshu) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352, and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(g), 3(2)(5). The court found that while the FIR alleges a serious incident of assault with a firearm and injuries to the complainant, the accused were not named in the initial FIR and the medical evidence showed only minor injuries inconsistent with the allegations. The court granted bail on Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions including court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case