State Government vs ajeet urf jeet urf laddu — 762/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010028632026

Filing Number

2698/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

762/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

NAGAL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ajeet urf jeet urf laddu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order CopyView PDF

    The court accepted the bail applications of both accused Shagun and Ajeet Urf Jeet Urf Laddu in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 351(3), and 3(5) related to an alleged firing incident at a wedding on 16-02-2026. The court found insufficient evidence of injury, no independent witnesses, delayed FIR filing without explanation, and no prior criminal history, making bail appropriate with conditions of Rs. 50,000 personal bond and Rs. 5,000 each by two sureties per accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 762/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the bail applications of both accused Shagun and Ajeet Urf Jeet Urf Laddu in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 351(3), and 3(5) related to an alleged firing incident at a wedding on 16-02-2026. The court found insufficient evidence of injury, no independent witnesses, delayed FIR filing without explanation, and no prior criminal history, making bail appropriate with conditions of Rs. 50,000 personal bond and Rs. 5,000 each by two sureties per accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case