State Government vs NITIN KUMARI URF LOVELY — 703/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120B. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010026972026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2536/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

703/2026

Registration Date

21-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

CHANDPUR

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120B
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(1) S

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

NITIN KUMARI URF LOVELY

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST) Act

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

hearing

25-02-2026

hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order Copy

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Nitin Kumari URF Lovely in a case involving cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal intimidation charges. The accused allegedly defrauded a scheduled caste complainant of ₹19,17,000 through a scheme posing as a matrimonial proposal, threatening violence when demanding repayment of the borrowed amounts. The court accepted the bail application, requiring the accused to furnish a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties, considering precedent from higher courts and the accused's interim bail status without misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Nitin Kumari URF Lovely in a case involving cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal intimidation charges. The accused allegedly defrauded a scheduled caste complainant of ₹19,17,000 through a scheme posing as a matrimonial proposal, threatening violence when demanding repayment of the borrowed amounts. The court accepted the bail application, requiring the accused to furnish a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties, considering precedent from higher courts and the accused's interim bail status without misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case