State Government vs NITIN KUMARI URF LOVELY — 703/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120B. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010026972026

Filing Number

2536/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

703/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

CHANDPUR

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120B

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(1) S

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government

Respondent(s)

1.NITIN KUMARI URF LOVELY

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

Order CopyView PDF

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Nitin Kumari URF Lovely in a case involving cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal intimidation charges. The accused allegedly defrauded a scheduled caste complainant of ₹19,17,000 through a scheme posing as a matrimonial proposal, threatening violence when demanding repayment of the borrowed amounts. The court accepted the bail application, requiring the accused to furnish a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties, considering precedent from higher courts and the accused's interim bail status without misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act
09-Mar-2026

hearing

Special Judge (Sc/ST) Act
25-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
20-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 703/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Act court in Bijnor granted bail to accused Nitin Kumari URF Lovely in a case involving cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal intimidation charges. The accused allegedly defrauded a scheduled caste complainant of ₹19,17,000 through a scheme posing as a matrimonial proposal, threatening violence when demanding repayment of the borrowed amounts. The court accepted the bail application, requiring the accused to furnish a bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties, considering precedent from higher courts and the accused's interim bail status without misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.