State Government vs shakeel — 673/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305A,331(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010020502026

Filing Number

1905/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

673/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

CHANDPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305A,331(4),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.shakeel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order CopyView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bijnor granted bail to Shakeel in a theft case (FIR No. 54/2026) under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(4), and 317(2), finding him eligible for bail despite prosecution objections. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of ₹30,000 with two sureties and restrictions on witness intimidation, while noting that the veracity of recovered evidence would be a matter for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 673/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bijnor granted bail to Shakeel in a theft case (FIR No. 54/2026) under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(4), and 317(2), finding him eligible for bail despite prosecution objections. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of ₹30,000 with two sureties and restrictions on witness intimidation, while noting that the veracity of recovered evidence would be a matter for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case