State Government vs shubham kumar — 610/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123,308(7),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBJ010020022026
Filing Number
1866/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
610/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-I-Addl. District Judge/Regular
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
70
Police Station
CHANDPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.shubham kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order CopyView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Shubham Kumar (Case No. 70/2026, FIR at Chandpur police station, Bijnor) filed under IPC Sections 123, 308(7), and 351(3). The accused is charged with extortion of approximately ₹10 lakhs through threats, including drugging the victim, taking obscene photographs, and threatening to circulate them on WhatsApp on multiple dates between February-March 2025. The court found the charges grave and cognizable, involving offenses punishable up to 10 years imprisonment, and held that releasing the accused on anticipatory bail would prejudice the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
I-Addl. District Judge/Regular
-
09-Mar-2026
hearing
I-Addl. District Judge/Regular
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
I-Addl. District Judge/Regular
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
I-Addl. District Judge/Regular
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 610/2026
Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Shubham Kumar (Case No. 70/2026, FIR at Chandpur police station, Bijnor) filed under IPC Sections 123, 308(7), and 351(3). The accused is charged with extortion of approximately ₹10 lakhs through threats, including drugging the victim, taking obscene photographs, and threatening to circulate them on WhatsApp on multiple dates between February-March 2025. The court found the charges grave and cognizable, involving offenses punishable up to 10 years imprisonment, and held that releasing the accused on anticipatory bail would prejudice the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts