State Government vs chandrapal singh, kalyan singh, munni devi — 595/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 82,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBJ010019792026

Filing Number

1843/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

595/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

207

Police Station

SHERKOT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 82,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.chandrapal singh, kalyan singh, munni devi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order CopyView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of Chandrapal Singh and others in a case involving allegations of bigamy, abuse, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 82, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that the FIR allegations were prima facie grave and cognizable in nature, noting that Chandrapal Singh had allegedly remarried while his first wife was alive and threatened the second wife, making bail inappropriate at this stage given the serious nature of charges and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    hearing

    I-Addl. District Judge/Regular

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 595/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Chandrapal Singh and others in a case involving allegations of bigamy, abuse, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 82, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that the FIR allegations were prima facie grave and cognizable in nature, noting that Chandrapal Singh had allegedly remarried while his first wife was alive and threatened the second wife, making bail inappropriate at this stage given the serious nature of charges and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case