INDRA PRATAP vs STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL — 489/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED ON MERARITS on 12th May 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPBH010080492025
Filing Number
7611/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
489/2025
Registration Date
23-Dec-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
26-5th Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED ON MERARITS
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INDRA PRATAP
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL
-
2.VIJAY PRAKASH URF RADHESHYAM
-
3.DEVMANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Indrapratap against the Magistrate's order dated 04.10.2025. The court upheld the lower court's decision to register a complaint (rather than file an FIR) under Section 173(4) of the CrPC, holding that the Magistrate properly exercised discretion within established legal principles, and no legal error warranting interference was found in the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
5th Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
11-May-2026
Hearing
5th Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
05-May-2026
Hearing
5th Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
5th Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
5th Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 489/2025
Summary The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Indrapratap against the Magistrate's order dated 04.10.2025. The court upheld the lower court's decision to register a complaint (rather than file an FIR) under Section 173(4) of the CrPC, holding that the Magistrate properly exercised discretion within established legal principles, and no legal error warranting interference was found in the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts