RAFI @ MOHAMMAD RAFI vs STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CIVIL — 22/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43 RULE 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPBH010025102024

Hearing

Next Hearing

01st May 2026

Filing Number

206/2024

Filing Date

02-05-2024

Registration No

22/2024

Registration Date

08-05-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 43 RULE 1

Petitioner(s)

RAFI @ MOHAMMAD RAFI

Adv. JITENDRA NATH SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CIVIL

PERGANA ADHIKARI KAISHERGANJ

TEHSEELDAR AISHERGANJ

GAON SABHA PYAREPUR

PRADHAN GAON SABHA PYAREPUR PER HISAMPUR TEH KAISHERGANJ DISTT. BAHRAICH

VIKAS KHAND JARWAL

KHAND VIKAS ADHIKARI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

08-04-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

03-02-2026

Hearing

16-01-2026

Hearing

15-01-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

30-09-2025
Copy of Order

Summary: The Miscellaneous Appeal No. 22/2024 before the District Judge, Bahraich, allowed the respondent's (Tahsildar, Kaiserganj) application under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act for condonation of delay. The court accepted the application with a fine of Rs. 500 and permitted the recall application to be heard on 29.10.2025, noting that the respondent's absence on 05.03.2025 was due to government duties rather than willful negligence. The respondent must deposit the fine within seven days, or the order will become void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Miscellaneous Appeal No. 22/2024 before the District Judge, Bahraich, allowed the respondent's (Tahsildar, Kaiserganj) application under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act for condonation of delay. The court accepted the application with a fine of Rs. 500 and permitted the recall application to be heard on 29.10.2025, noting that the respondent's absence on 05.03.2025 was due to government duties rather than willful negligence. The respondent must deposit the fine within seven days, or the order will become void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case