MAINUDDIN vs State of U.P. — 547/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBH010013282026

Filing Number

1244/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

547/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

948

Police Station

NAWABGANJ

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAINUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is AllowedView PDF

    Summary The Third Additional District and Sessions Court of Baraich granted bail to Mainuddin (accused under NDPS Act sections 8/20) on March 12, 2026. The court accepted his second bail petition, noting he was previously on bail and had been in judicial custody since March 1, 2026, after a non-bailable warrant was issued. Mainuddin was released on bail of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount and undertakings to appear in court, not tamper with prosecution witnesses, and cooperate in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Third Additional District and Sessions Court of Baraich granted bail to Mainuddin (accused under NDPS Act sections 8/20) on March 12, 2026. The court accepted his second bail petition, noting he was previously on bail and had been in judicial custody since March 1, 2026, after a non-bailable warrant was issued. Mainuddin was released on bail of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount and undertakings to appear in court, not tamper with prosecution witnesses, and cooperate in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case