MASTRAM PADNEY vs STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL — 521/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBH010012822026

Filing Number

1201/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

521/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

FAKARPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MASTRAM PADNEY

    Adv. PANKAJ KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is AllowedView PDF

    Summary The District Court of Bahraich granted bail to three accused persons (Mastram Pandey, Chandrasen Pandey, and Suresh Kumar) in a case involving communal violence during Holi celebrations on March 3-4, 2026. The accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 323, 121, 132, 324, and 109 BNS, along with the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2023, for allegedly attacking police personnel and others with stones, sticks, and lathis following a dispute between Brahmin and Yadav communities. The court approved bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 521/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court of Bahraich granted bail to three accused persons (Mastram Pandey, Chandrasen Pandey, and Suresh Kumar) in a case involving communal violence during Holi celebrations on March 3-4, 2026. The accused were charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 323, 121, 132, 324, and 109 BNS, along with the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2023, for allegedly attacking police personnel and others with stones, sticks, and lathis following a dispute between Brahmin and Yadav communities. The court approved bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case