ASHISH PRATAP SINGH vs STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL — 518/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBH010012692026

Filing Number

1189/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

518/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

07

Police Station

RANIPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH PRATAP SINGH

    Adv. BRIJPAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is RejectedView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Bahraich, rejected the bail application of Ashish Pratap Singh (dated 19.03.2026) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, 105, 191(2), 191(3), and 190. The court found that the severity of the crime—involving an alleged armed mob attack resulting in the death of the victim (Triloki) from injuries sustained during the beating—and the strong evidence on record (witness statements, postmortem report, and recovered weapons) made bail inappropriate, despite the accused's claims of innocence and false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 518/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Bahraich, rejected the bail application of Ashish Pratap Singh (dated 19.03.2026) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, 105, 191(2), 191(3), and 190. The court found that the severity of the crime—involving an alleged armed mob attack resulting in the death of the victim (Triloki) from injuries sustained during the beating—and the strong evidence on record (witness statements, postmortem report, and recovered weapons) made bail inappropriate, despite the accused's claims of innocence and false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case